Read the collected works of Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens).
More E-texts
Christian
Science
by Mark Twain
a.k.a. Samuel Clemens
(1835-1910)
Preface
| Book 1: 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 | 8
| 9 | Book 2: 1
| 2 | 3
| 4 | 5
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
| 10 | 11
| 12 | 13
| 14 | 15
| Appendix A | Appendix
B | Appendix C | Appendix
D | Appendix E | Appendix
F | Conclusion
BOOK II
CHAPTER
V
It is hard to locate her, she shifts about so much. She is a
shining drop of quicksilver which you put your finger on and it isn't there.
There is a paragraph in the Autobiography (page 96) which places in seemingly
darkly significant procession three Personages:
1. The Virgin Mary
2. Jesus of Nazareth.
3. Mrs. Eddy.
This is the paragraph referred to:
"No person can take the individual place of the Virgin
Mary. No person can compass or fulfil the individual mission of Jesus of Nazareth.
No person can take the place of the author of Science and Health, the discoverer
and founder of Christian Science. Each individual must fill his own niche in
time and eternity."
I have read it many times, but I still cannot be sure that I
rightly understand it. If the Saviour's name had been placed first and the Virgin
Mary's second and Mrs. Eddy's third, I should draw the inference that a descending
scale from First Importance to Second Importance and then to Small Importance
was indicated; but to place the Virgin first, the Saviour second, and Mrs. Eddy
third, seems to turn the scale the other way and make it an ascending scale
of Importances, with Mrs. Eddy ranking the other two and holding first place.
I think that that was perhaps the intention, but none but a
seasoned Christian Scientist can examine a literary animal of Mrs. Eddy's creation
and tell which end of it the tail is on. She is easily the most baffling and
bewildering writer in the literary trade.
Eddy is a commonplace name, and would have an unimpressive aspect
in the list of the reformed Holy Family. She has thought of that. In the book
of By-laws written by her--"impelled by a power not one's own"--there
is a paragraph which explains how and when her disciples came to confer a title
upon her; and this explanation is followed by a warning as to what will happen
to any female Scientist who shall desecrate it:
"The title of Mother. Therefore if a student of Christian
Science shall apply this title, either to herself or to others, except as the
term for kinship according to the flesh, it shall be regarded by the Church
as an indication of disrespect for their Pastor Emeritus, and unfitness to be
a member of the Mother-Church."
She is the Pastor Emeritus.
While the quoted paragraph about the Procession seems to indicate
that Mrs. Eddy is expecting to occupy the First Place in it, that expectation
is not definitely avowed. In an earlier utterance of hers she is clearer--clearer,
and does not claim the first place all to herself, but only the half of it.
I quote from Mr. Peabody's book again:
"In the Christian Science Journal for April, 1889, when
it was her property, and published by her, it was claimed for her, and with
her sanction, that she was equal with Jesus, and elaborate effort was made to
establish the claim.
"Mrs. Eddy has distinctly authorized the claim in her behalf
that she herself was the chosen successor to and equal of Jesus."
In her Miscellaneous Writings (using her once favorite "We"
for "I") she says that "While we entertain decided views... and shall express them as duty demands, we shall claim no especial gift from
our divine origin," etc.
Our divine origin. It suggests Equal again. It is inferable,
then, that in the near by-and-by the new Church will officially rank the Holy
Family in the following order:
1. Jesus of Nazareth.--1. Our Mother.
2. The Virgin Mary.
SUMMARY
I am not playing with Christian Science and its founder, I am
examining them; and I am doing it because of the interest I feel in the inquiry.
My results may seem inadequate to the reader, but they have for me clarified
a muddle and brought a sort of order out of a chaos, and so I value them.
My readings of Mrs. Eddy's uninspired miscellaneous literary
efforts have convinced me of several things:
1. That she did not write Science and Health.
2. That the Deity did (or did not) write it.
3. That She thinks She wrote it. 4. That She believes She wrote it under the
Deity's inspiration.
5. That She believes She is a Member of the Holy Family.
6. That She believes She is the equal of the Head of it.
Finally, I think She is now entitled to the capital S--on her
own evidence.
Preface
| Book 1: 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 | 8
| 9 | Book 2: 1
| 2 | 3
| 4 | 5
| 6 | 7
| 8 | 9
| 10 | 11
| 12 | 13
| 14 | 15
| Appendix A | Appendix
B | Appendix C | Appendix
D | Appendix E | Appendix
F | Conclusion